2. Should the United States stop using the death penalty?
In “Rare and Decreasing,” Richard Dieter writes about why he thinks the death penalty “is becoming largely irrelevant in American society and may not last another 10 years.”
When the U.S. Supreme Court considers whether a punishment is cruel and unusual, they examine it in terms of current standards of decency. The Court looks to the number of states using the punishment, and whether its use is frequent or declining. In 2005, for example, the court struck down the death penalty for juvenile offenders because most states did not allow it, and its use was rare and decreasing even where it was allowed.The court is likely to apply the same analysis to the death penalty itself. Eighteen states have already ended capital punishment and the governors of three other states have halted executions. New Hampshire and Delaware may soon be added to the list of abolition states. Moreover, the use of the death penalty in states that retain it is decreasing. If the death penalty is being used by only a small number of states, and if there is a clear national trend away from capital punishment, the Supreme Court could find that it has become a cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment.
On the other hand, Robert Blecker writes in “Punishment Needs to Be Punishment,” that the death penalty should continue to be an option for the worst offenders:
When pollsters seek the appropriate punishment for the worst of the worst – a man who rapes and tortures a child, a serial killer, a depraved mass murderer such as Timothy McVeigh, etc. – overwhelmingly the people choose death as deserved. Many who prefer life without parole wrongly imagine that sadistic or callous killers experience prison as a daily punishment worse than death. My thousands of hours inside maximum-security prisons these past 30 years contradict this: Inside prison, prisoners and officers alike reject punishment. “What a man did out there is none of my business. I only care how he behaves inside,” they declare. Inside prison, too often those who deserve it least suffer most. Vicious murderers who prey on the helpless and vulnerable, once captured, become perfectly well behaved “inmates.” Posing no future threat, they get transferred from maximum- to medium-security prisons where they can visit, hang out, watch sports and movies on color TV, play basketball and softball or read a good book, mostly all day every day.If the U.S. Supreme Court wants to promote human dignity, if it really reflects the will of the people and not their leaders, the justices will constitutionally continue the punishment of death, allowing us to denounce our worst predators and at least declare our commitment to — although we rarely deliver — real justice.
Read the entire Opinion piece, then tell us …
— Should the United States stop using the death penalty? Why?
— Do you have concerns about the fair application of the death penalty, or about the possibility of the criminal justice system executing an innocent person? Do you think capital punishment is “cruel and unusual punishment” and therefore prohibited by the Constitution?
— Do you think the death penalty serves a purpose, like deterring crime, providing relief for victims’ families or imparting “real justice?”
— Do you agree with Mr. Dieter that the death penalty is becoming “irrelevant” and “may not last another 10 years?”
3. In Cold Blood by Truman Capote
- Make predictions about the book based on the following covers:
- With your partner, look up information on the author.
- Family
- Where he lived
- History with drugs and alcohol
- Education
- Why he was drawn to this story
- What makes his writing special
Capote had a very serious alcohol problem in one point in his life, but got out of it by taking up drugs, such as the ones that were found in his system when he died, Valium, anti seizer medication, and painkillers.
ReplyDeleteHe was born in New Orleans, Louisiana, and died in Los Angeles, he also lived in NYC, Monroeville, and Fire Island(NY)
ReplyDeleteBecca & Kati
ReplyDeleteIt looks like it is about murder and looks like it's set back in time with the death penalty because of the house with the rope and gun on the front. The quote on the front is about murder.
He was drawn to the story because he was interested in unexplained murder and he became friends with those involved in the investigation. He would start conversations and then write them down.
Also it looks like there are two murderers
DeleteKate & Emily
ReplyDeleteWe think that maybe the guy that he killed first came off as a nice guy and that maybe they will discuss how people can be perceived as normal nice people but have secret motives or be hiding something.
Education:
Went to Greenwich High School where he worked on the school newspaper and wrote for the schools literary journal called the Greenwich.
In 1942 attended the Franklin School, a private school for one year and then that was the end of his education.
Hannah W. and Isabel A.
ReplyDeleteIn this book we talked about how we think that the main character committed a murder and people are debating on whether or not to give him the death penalty. We can assume that it is a dark book, based on the books cover. Truman Capote's writing is very clear and concise, he can be quite controversial and usually has a dark background or feeling to his writing. Although the dark meanings of his stories may not be evident if you take a closer look you will most likely see them.
What makes Truman Capote's writing style special?
ReplyDeleteCapote was a very controversial writer, most everything he wrote had a dark side, even some of his lighter stories. It's easy to understand his writing because he doesn't go out of his way to use super complicated words.